In personal conversations, large and small themes, people and anecdotes condense into an intellectual examination of the collective history of his generation, which, after the trauma of the Nazi era, sought its own ability to speak through politicization in the student movement.
Berlin as a place where his individual career intersects with contemporary historical developments in an exemplary manner comes up again and again. What relationship between architecture and politics becomes visible on the basis of his biography? What can we learn from this for the critical discourse on architecture and the city today?